Long-time readers know that I've long been an advocate of more states breaking off of the federal ACA exchange (HealthCare.Gov) and establishing their own versions instead. While there are certainly benefits to utilizing the federal exchange (standardized interface, user experience, branding & marketing), there are also numerous benefits to states operating their own platforms.
In the early days of the ACA, in addition to the infamous technical meltdown of HealthCare.Gov, many of the state-based exchanges (SBEs) of the time included horror stories in which the 1.0 versions of SBEs either failed miserably, cost an insane amount and/or both. The most famous examples include...
Individual Market Proposed Average Rate Changes for Plan Year 2027
The summary table below provides an overview of the proposed average rate changes from 2026 in the individual health insurance market, as reported by the insurers.
It is important to note these are the initial rates proposed by the insurers and filed with the Departments. Rates are subject to review and approval by the Departments, and the final approved rates may vary from these proposed rates for many reasons.
Additionally, the actual rate change a consumer will experience in 2027 can vary from the average – with factors such as specific plan, geographic rating area, and age playing a major role.
...Aspirus Health Plan will be new to the exchange for Plan Year 2027. While UCare individual plans were supported throughout Plan Year 2026 to ensure a smooth transition for Minnesotans after the company was acquired by Medica, UCare plans will no longer be available in Plan Year 2027.
